|Table of Contents|

EFFECTS OF NEW FUNGAL ACTIVATOR PROTEIN ON PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERS OF SOYBEAN(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2007年05期
Page:
691-694
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
EFFECTS OF NEW FUNGAL ACTIVATOR PROTEIN ON PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERS OF SOYBEAN
Author(s):
WU Guang-yan1; QIU De-wen1; 2; YANG Xiu-fen2; WU Guang-fan3; ZHAO Sheng-ying4
1Fujian Forest and Agricultural University，Fuzhou 350000；
2Institute of Plant Protection，Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Beijing 100094；
3Hehai University，Nanjing 210000;
4Jinan Shibang Agrochemicals.CO.LTD，Jinan 250100
Keywords:
Soybean; Activator protein; Chlorophyll; Soluble sugar; Soluble protein
PACS:
S565.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.05.010
Abstract:
In order to approach the mechanism of enhancing plant growth by new fungal activator protein，the effect of activator protein with different concentration on physiological characteristics of soybean was studied.Compared with control after 7 d treatment with 1，2 and 5 μg mL-1activator protein，root activity of soybean was increased by 44.2%、54.5% and19.8%，and nitratereductase activity was increased by 61.33%、138.37% and 53.2%，respectively.Compared with control after 15 d treatment with 1，2 and 5 μg mL-1?activator protein，the content of chlorophyll in leaves was increased by 12.56%，17.32% and 5.32%，the content of soluble sugar was increased by 18.56%，31.02% and 18.69%，and the content of soluble protein was increased by 17.36%，31.96% and 23.10%，respectively.In conclusion，after plants were treated with activator protein of different concentration，the physiological indexes related to plant growth were all enhanced to different degree，and the effect of 2 μg mL-1activator protein was of best efficiency to the plant.

References:

［1］Dixon R A，Lamb C J.Molecular communication in interactions between plants and microbial pathogens[J].Annu Rev of Plant Physiol and Plant Mol Biol，1990，40:347-364.

[2] Ebel J，Scheel D.Elicitor recognition and signal transduction.In Boller T，Meins F，eds，Plant Gene Research[M].Vienna：Springer Verlag，1990.
[3]Lamb C J，Lawton M A，Dron M，Dixon R A.Signals and transduction mechanisms for activation of plant defenses against microbial attack[J].Cell，1989，56:215-224.
[4]Anderson A J.The biology of glycoproteins elicitors.in：T Kosuge E W Nester，eds.Plant-Microbe Interactions Ⅲ[M].New York：McGraw Hill，1989，87-130.
[5]Darvill A G，Albersheim P.Phytoalexins and their elicitors A defense against microbial infection in plants[J].Annu Rev of Plant Physiol，1984，35:243-293.
[6]Templeton M D，Lamb C J.Elicitors and defense gene activation[J].Plant Cell Environ，1988，11：395-401.
[7]郭泽建，蒋冬花.植物病原菌激发子与信号识别机理[J].浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版)，2003，26(1):1-7.
[8]Wei Z M，Wei Z，Laby R J，et al.Harpin，elicitor of the hyper-sensitive response produced by the plant pathogen Erwinia.Amylovora[J].Science，1992，257:85-88.
[9]邱德文.微生物蛋白农药研究进展[J].中国生物防治，2004，20(2):91-94.
[10]邱德文.植物用多功能真菌蛋白质[P].CN1344727A，2002-04-17.
[11]Chaoui A，Jarrar B，ElFerjaniE.Effects of cadmium and copper on peroxidase，NADH oxidase and IAA oxidase activities in cell wal，l soluble and microsomal membrane fractions of pea roots [J].J Plant Physiol，2004，161:1225-1234.
[12]邹琦，李合生.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社，2000:173-174.
[13]张志良，瞿伟菁.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社，2003:41-67.
[14]朱广廉，钟诲文，张爱琴.植物生理学实验[M].北京:北京大学出版社，1990：51-54.
[15]白宝璋，靳占忠，李德春.植物生理生化测试技术[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社，1995：34-100.
[16]赵利辉，邱德文，刘铮，等.植物激活蛋白对水稻抗性相关基因转录水平的影响[J].中国农业科学，2005，38(7):1358-1363.
[17]段同钊.新型植物生化激活剂-康壮素[J].蔬菜，2003，12:40-41.
[18]李丽，邱德文，刘铮，等.植物激活蛋白对番茄抗病性的诱导作用[J].中国生物防治，2005，21(4):265-268.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-10-20