|Table of Contents|

INFLUENCES OF ROW-SPACINGON COMPETING LIMITEDRESOURCESIN SOYBEAN (GLY CINE MAX L.Merrill)(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2004年03期
Page:
215-221
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
INFLUENCES OF ROW-SPACINGON COMPETING LIMITEDRESOURCESIN SOYBEAN (GLY CINE MAX L.Merrill)
Author(s):
Liu Xiaobing1 2Jin Jian1Wang Guang hua1S .J .Herbert2A.M .Hashemi2
1.Northeast Insti tute of Geography and Agro -ecology , CAS , Harbin , 150040 ;
2.Department of Plant and Soi l Sciences , Universi ty of Massachuset ts , Amherst , MA , 01003 US A)
Keywords:
Row spacings Light interception Water and nut rient uptake Weed cont rol Soybean
PACS:
S 565.1
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2004.03.0215
Abstract:
Grow ing soybean in dif ferent row -spacings int roduces competi tion .Competition begins when theimmediate supply of a sing le necessary facto r falls below the combined demands of all plant s.This paper review sthe main competition facto rs of genoty pes , light , w ater , nutrients and weed in responses to row spacings fo r thepast four decades .It demonstrated that responses of soybean genotypes to row width differ among cultivars,w hich depend on seasonal rainfall and i rrigation .Determinate ty pes produce more yield in narrow -rows , andcultivars with lodging resistance should be adopted in narrow -spacings , but indeterminate soybean should alsobe used to optimize yields in certain system .Narrow -compared with w ide -row soy bean (Glycine max)cultivationincreases light interception (LI)and dominant components fo r the increase come from LAI , light ex tinctioncoefficient s and branch ty pes .Water use efficiency and evapot ranspiration are not inf luenced by row spacing, but seed yield could be increased if irrigation is applied .Nut rient uptake is sig nificant ly affected by rowspacing , seed yields and uptake of N , P , K in plants increases wi th decreasing row spacing , and the effect s dependon the fertilizer levels .Other factors rather than row spacing affect nitrogen fix ation .Weed density , peaktime and periodicity of weed emergence are no t affected by row spacing , but bet ter complementary w eed cont rolby the herbicides at the used doses can be obtained in narrow spacing due to the reduced weed number and dryw eight .Mo re researches are required to investigate the physiological responses , nut rient and w ater uptake andtranslocation , light utilization at different layers of canopy and soil enviro nment changes in dif ferent row -spacings.

References:

1  Bleasdale, J .K .A.Some problems and prospects in plant spacing[ J] .Journal of the Royal Agricultural S ociety of England .1973 ,134 :89 -100

2  Cooper , R.L .Response of soybean cultivars to narrow rows andplanting rates under weed-free conditions[ J] .Agronomy Journal.1977 , 69 :89 -92
3  Cooper , R.L .Fausey N.R., St reet er , J .G .Yield pot ential of soybeangrow n under a subi rrigat ion/ drainage w at er management system[J] .Agronomy Journal.1991 , 83(5):884 -887
4  Milthorpe, F.L .The nature and analysis of com petit ion betweenplant s of diff erent species .In ’ M echanisms in Biological C ompet ition’(ed.F.L .Milthorpe)[ C] .Symposium , S ociety of ExperimentalBiology .1961 , 15 :330 -355
5  Donald , C .M .Competiti on among crop and pasture plants[ J] .Advancesin Ag ronomy .1963 , 15 :111 -118
6  Loomis , R .S ., Wi lliams , W.A.Maximum crop p roductivity :anestim ate[ J] .C rop S cience .1963 , 3 :67 -72
7  Herbert , S .J .Grow th and grain yield of Lupinus albus cv.Ult ra atdiff erent plant populat ions[ J] .New Zealand Journal of AgriculturalResearch .1977 , 20 :118 -125
8  Hinson , K ., Hanson , W .D .Competit ion studies in soybeans[ J] .Crop Science .1962 , 2 :117 -123
9  Singh , J .N ., Tripathi , S .K ., Negi , P .S .Response of spring soybeanto dat e of plant ing, plant populat ion and row spacing[ J] .IndianJournal of Agronomy .1973 , 18:297 -301
10 Lin , C .S ., Torrie, J .H .Ef fect of plant spacing w ithin a row on thecompetit ive ability of soybean genot ypes[ J] .Crop Science .1968 ,50 :585 -588
11 Hicks , D .R., Pendleton , J .W ., Bernard , R.L .et al.Response ofsoybean plant t ypes to planting pat terns[ J] .Agronomy Journal.1969 , 61 :290 -293
12 Robinson , S .L ., Wilcox , J .R.Comparison of det erminat e and indeterminatesoybean near -isolines and their response t o row spacingand planting date[ J] .C rop S cience.1998 , 38(6):1554 -1557
13 Ablet t , G.R., Beversdorf , W.D., Di rks , V.A .Row w idth andseeding rate perf ormance of indeterminate , semidetermian te and determinatesoybean[ J] .Journal of Production Agriculture .1991 , 4(3):391 -395
14 Ibrahim , M .E .Response of determinate and indeterminate soybeancultivars to plant pat tern and density[ J] .Annals of Agricultural S cience,-Moshtohor.1996 , 34(4):1431 -1456
15 Bow ers , G .R., Rabb , J .L ., Ashlock , L.O ., et al.Row spacing inthe early soybean production syst em[ J] .Agronomy Journal.2000 ,92 (3):524 -531
16 Weaver , D.B ., Akridge , R.L ., Thomas , C .A.Grow th habi t ,planting date , and row -spacing ef fect s on lat e -plant ed soybean[ J] .Crop Science.1991 , 31(3):805 -810
17 Beuerlein , J .E .Yi eld of indeterminate and determinate semidw arfsoybean for several planting dat es , row spacings , and seeding rates[ J] .Journal of Product ion Agriculture .1988 , 1(4):300 -303
18 Grat erol , Y.E.Elmore R.W., Eisenhauer , D.E .Narrow - rowplan ting systems f or fu rrow -irrigated soybean[ J] .Journal of Production Agricultu re .1996 , 9(4):546 -553
19 Hugie, W .V., Orf , J .H .Genot ypi c int eraction of early matu rit ysoybean with row spacings[ J] .Crop Science.1989 , 29(6):1447 -1451
20 Adams , P.D., Weaver , D.B .Brachytic stem trait , row spacing ,and plant population ef fects on soybean yield[ J] .Crop S cience .1998 , 38(3):750 -755
21 Huang , C .Y ., Boyer, J .S ., Vanderhoef , L .N .Acet ylene reduction (nit rogen fixat ion)and metabolic act ivit ies of soybean havingvarious leaf and nodule water potent ial[ J] .Plant Physiology .1975 ,56 , 222 -227
22 Redden , R., Desborough , P., Tompkins , W .,et al.Responses ofadzuki bean as af fected by row spacing , plant densit y and variet y[ J] .Aust ralian Journal of Experiment al Agriculture.2001 , 41 (2):235 -243
23 Mathew , J .P ., Herbert , S .J ., Zhang , et al.Diff erent ial responseof soybean yield component s to the timing of light enrichment[ J] .Agronomy Journal.2000 , 92(6):1156 -1161
24 Singh , J .N ., Peters , D.B ., Pendleton , J .W.Net and spectral radiation in soybean canopies[ J] .Agronomy Journal.1968 , 60 :542 -545
25 Asanome , N .Ikeda, T .Ef fect of b ranch direct ion’ s arrangement onsoybean yi eld and yield component s[ J] .Journal of Agronomy andCrop Sci ence.1998 , 181(2):95 -102
26 Wells , R., Burt on , J .W ., Kilen , T .C .Soybean growth and lightint erception:response to diff ering leaf and st em morphology[ J] .Crop Sci ence.1993 , 33(3):520 -524
27 Livingston , S .D.The effect s of microclimat e on the yi eld of Yorksoybeans in fi ve row arrangements[ J] .Dissertation Abstracts International, B 1975 ,(35):3702 -3703
28 Board , J .E., Harville, B.G .Explanations for greater light int erception in narrow - vs .wide-row soybean[ J] .C rop Science .1992 ,32(1):198 -202
29 Board , J .E., Kamal , M ., Harville, B .G .Temporal import ance ofgreater light int ercept ion to increase yield in narrow -row soybean[ J] .Agronomy Journal.1992 , 84(4):575 -579
30 Wells , R.Soybean grow th response to plant density :relat ionships amongcanopy photosynthesi s, leaf area , and light interception[ J] .Crop Sci ence.1991 , 31(3):755 -76
31 Flenet , F., Kini ry , J ., Board , J .E ., et al.Row spacing ef fect s onlight extinct ion coef ficients of corn , sorghum , soybean and sunflower[J] .Agronomy Journal.1996 , 88(2):185 -190
32 But tery , B .R.Eff ect s of plant population and fertilizer on thegrowth and yield of soybeans[ J] .Canadian Jou rnal of Plant S cience .1969 , 49 :659 -673
33 Reicosky , D.C ., Millington , R.J ., Klute , A .et al.Patt erns of water uptake and root dist ribution of soybeans (Glycine ma x )inthe presence of a w ater table[ J] .Agronomy Journal.1972 , 64 :292-297
34 Burnside, O .C .,Colville , W.L.Soybean and weed yields as aff ect edby irrigat ion , row spacing , t illage and amiben[ J] .Weeds 1964 , 12 :109 -124
35 Mishra, M .N ., Singh , A .M .Root development in relation to plan tpopulat ion and fertility levels in soybeans [ J] .Annu .Arid Zone1968 , 7 :121 -126
36 Peters , D.B ., J ohnson , L .C .Soi l moisture use by soyabeans[ J] .Agronomy Journal 1960 , 52 :687 -689
37 Raper, C .D .Jr., Barber, S .A .Rooting syst ems of soybeans .I .Dif ferences in root morphology among variet ies[ J] .Ag ronomy Journal.1970 , 62 :581 -584
38 Arya, L .M ., Blake, G.R., Farrell , D.A .A field study of soi l w aterdepletion patt erns in presence of growing soybean roots :III .Root ing charact eristics and root ext raction of soil w ater[ C] .SoilScience S ociety of America Proceeding p .1975 , 437 -444
39 Rajput , R.L ., Kaushik , J .P ., Verma, O .P .Consumpt ive w at eruse eff iciency and moisture ext raction patt ern of soybean as influencedby irrigat ion , phosphorus and row spacing[ J] .Haryana Journalof Agronomy .1991 , 7 :1 -6
40 Dougherty , C .T .The influence of i rrigat ion , row spacing , plan tpopulat ion , and inoculat ion on the yield of soybeans in Canterbu ry[ J] .New Zealand Jou rnal’ of Agricultu ral Research .1969 , 12 :367-380
41 Lehrsch , G.A .Whisler , F .D .Bueh ring , N .W .C ropping syst eminfluences on ext ract able w at er for mono - and double -croppedsoybean[ J] .Agricultural Wat er Management.1994 , 26 (1 -2):13-25
42 Weber , C .R .Physiological concepts for high soybean yields[ J] .Field Crop Abst ract s .1968 , 21 :313 -317
43 Sabbe , W .E ., Hat tey , J .A .Soybean fertilit y and row width studieson groups IV and V soybean on a non -irrigat ed loessial soil[ J] .Research Series Arkansas Agricultural Experiment St at ion .1993 ,425 :137 -139
44 Khan , W.A ., Qayoom , S .M ., Tunio , S .D.Ef fect of plant ing geometryand fertility level on performance of soybean[ J] .SarhadJou rnal of Agricultu re .1993 , 9 (3):201 -203
45 Rajput , R.L., Kaushik , J .P., Verma, O.P .Nut rient uptake bysoybean (Glycine ma x L.Merill)[ J] .Journal of Oilseeds Research.1991 , 8 :113 -116
46 Jain , H .C ., Tiw ari , JP ., Jain , K .K ., et al.Eff ect of herbicideson nut rient uptake by soybean crop and w eeds under dif ferent rowspacings and seeding rates[ J] .World Weeds .1995 , 2(3 -4):197-201
47 Rajput , R.L ., Shrivastava , U .K .Concent ration of NPK in diff erentplant parts of soybeans (Glycine ma x )as inf luenced by levelsof irrigat ion , phosphorus and row spacing[ J] .Agricultural ScienceDigest .1994 , 14(3 -4):201 -204
48 Scheiner , J .D., Gutierrez , F.H ., Lavado , R.S .Root grow th andphosphorus uptake in w ide- and narrow -row soybeans[ J] .Journalof Plant Nutrition .2000 , 23 (9):1241 -1249
49 Pracht , J .E ., Nickell , C .D ., Harper , J .E ., et al.Agronomic evaluation of non -nodulating and hypernodulating mutants of soybean[ J] .Crop Science.1994 , 34(3):738 -740
50 S prent , J .I ., Bradford , A .M .Nit rogen fixation in field beans (Viciaf aba)as aff ect ed by population densit y , shading and i ts relat ionshipwi th soil moisture[ J] .Journal of Agricultural Science .Cambridge, 1977 , 88 :303 -310
51 Hume , D .J ., Crisw ell , J .G ., St evenson , K.R.Ef fects of soi lmoisture around nodules on ni trogen fi xation by w ell watered soybeans[J] .Canadian Journal of Plant S cience .1976 , 56 :811 -815
52 Jamro , G .H ., Memon , G .H ., Ibupot a, K.A .Ef fect of combinednit rogen and row spacing on nodulation and grain yield of soybean[ J] .Sarhad Journal of Agricul ture.1990 , 6(2):107 -112
53 S ingh , H .N ., Prasad , F.M ., Varshney , M .L .Ef fect of nit rogenand row spacing on nodulat ion growth and yield of soybean(Glycine max L .Merr) var Gaurav[ J] .New Agriculturist .,1992 , 3 :31 -34
54 Umarani , R., S elvaraj , J .A.Eff ect of w eed and crop densities onseed yield of soybean[ J] .World Weeds .1996 , 3(1 -2):43 -46
55 Eat on , B .J ., Russ , O .G ., Feltner , K.C .Competit ion of velvetleaf , prickly sida , and Veni ce mallow in soybeans[ J] .Weed Science.1976 , 24 :224 -228
56 Mickelson , J .A ., Renner , K .A.Weed cont rol using reduced ratesof postemergence herbicides in narrow and wide row soybean[ J] .Journal of Production Agriculture.1997 , 10 :431 -437
57 Dubey , M .P .Grow th , yield and economics of soybean (Glycinemax )as inf luenced by w eed control methods and row spacings[ J] .Indian Journal of Ag ronomy .1998 , 43(3):540 -545
58 Sw ant on , C .J ., Vyn , T .J ., Chandler, K., et al.Weed management strat egies for no -ti ll soybean (Glycine max )grown on claysoils[ J] .Weed Technology .1998 , 12(4):660 -669
59 Nimje , P .M .Eff ect of row spacing , mulching and w eed cont rol onw eed grow th and yield of soybean (Glycine ma x )[ J] .IndianJournal of Agronomy.1996 , 41(3):427 -432
60 Avav , T .,Okereke, O .U .Eff ect of spatial arrangement and w eedingregime on w eed grow th in soybean (Glycine max (L .)Merr .)[ J] .Crop Research Hisar .1997 , 14 (2):199 -204
61 Shaw , D.R., Smith , C .A ., S nipes , C .E.Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia)cont rol in soybean (Glycine ma x )grow n in rotations of97 - and 18 -cm row spacings[ J] .Weed Science.1989 , 37 :748-752
62 Anaele, A .O., Bishnoi , U .R.Ef fects of ti llage , w eed controlmethod and row spacing on soybean yield and certain soil properties[ J] .Soil and Tillage Research .1992 , 23 :333 -340
63 S haw , D .R., Bruff , S .A ., Smith , C .A.Eff ect of soybean(Glycine max )row spacing on chemi cal cont rol of sicklepod (Cassiaobtusifolia)[ J] .Weed Technology .1991 , 5 :286 -290
64 Nice , G .R.W ., Buehring , N .W ., Shaw , D.R.Sicklepod (Sennaobtusif olia) response to shading , soybean (Glycine max ) rowspacing , and population in three management syst ems[ J] .WeedTechnology .2001 , 15 :155 -162
65 Young , B .G ., Young , J .M ., Gonzini , L .C ., et al.Weed managementin narrow - and wide -row glyphosate -resistant soybean(Glycine ma x )[ J] .Weed Technology.2001 , 15 :112 -121
66 Marw at , K .B ., Naf ziger , E .D.Cocklebur and velvetleaf int erf erencew ith soybean grown at dif ferent densit ies and plant ing patt erns[ J] .Agronomy Journal.1990 , 82(3):531 -534
67 Mulugeta , D., Boerboom , C .M .Seasonal abundance and spatialpatt ern of S et aria faberi , Chenopodium album and Abutilontheophrasti in reduced -t illage soybeans[ J] .Weed S cience .1999 ,47(1):95 -106

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-01-01